7950x vs 7950x3d reddit

7950x vs 7950x3d reddit. I could get new 7950X from local website for about $470 (Im from eastern EU), and Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $300 more expensive than 7950X I have found, its around $800. Pretty much this, 13900K sounds like a product that needs a lot of care when choosing the parts, and then has to go through all the memory and core overclock pain, to get it up to parity with 7950X3D. 7800x3d and 7950x are overkill as is. It’s still a great gaming cpu even if it runs too hot but if it’s not that critical and cash isn’t an issue get the x3d. 6M subscribers in the Amd community. 7% over the Core i9-13900KS. . All Ryzen 9+ chips have two chip dies which are connected together using a technology called Infinity Fabric, so the cores on different complexe's can communicate. And in some workloads the 3D cache does help. 209 votes, 108 comments. Therefore u can get slightly more performance in games that don’t require v-cache. Regardless, they are ridiculously more efficient. For example, a user review in this comparison page claims that the 7950X3D "is haunted by software bugs" (here you have an example of a bug with AMD's CPU). Both are very good for current games. I've also looked into server aspects but it kinda throws my budget in some fold. com Mar 5, 2023 · The 7950X3D is more competitive in the threaded benchmarks, but it doesn’t score any convincing wins. It's not like it struggles in gaming. I plan on gaming (mostly 1440p) and streaming. I've seen 7950x3d uses around half as power as 13900k providing almost identical benchmark results, where 7950x is in middle for power/perf. Another 7950x vs 7950x3d post Linus Tech Tips - Reddit vs PC Part Picker vs LTT Forum – Where Should YOU Go for Build Advice? November 18, 2023 at 09:50AM Hi Does anyone have any data for the 5950x vs 7950x with settings where all cores can be loaded, eg, encoding two files simultaneously at RF 37 Enc… I just built my new rig with a 7950X3D on a Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master. 186 fps for the 7950x and 231 for the 7950x3d according to toma hardware with PBO and CO on both cpus but they tested with a 4090 on 1440p. you may not have to thermal limit the 7950x except if you are targeting a power envelope or having to avoid thermal throttling because of cooling deficiencies. I typically run a host of VMs and dual boot on my machine. Mar 7, 2023 · Both the Ryzen 9 7950X and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D are based on AMD’s Zen 4 architecture — but the latter comes with AMD’s 3D V-Cache. probably for you it wont make difference. 7950x3d needs those drivers to work properly for games. I intended to dedicate the vcache CCD to a windows VM with a passthrough 4090 while keeping the arch linux host on the non vcache cores. Whereas 7950X3D will just work with modest power supply, cooling, and 6000mhz EXPO ram sticks made out of mid-tier DDR5 chips. I was looking at both the Ryzen 9-7900x and Ryzen 9-7950x and i noticed a core and thread lead with the 7950x, but is $200 more expensive. Not every launch review shows the AMD processor in front, there are also counter-examples. So my 1st question is for my need, which cpu will give me the best results in perf/ power efficiency/ longivity for my usecase? I did a quick and dirty undervolt on the 7950x (0. The only reason a 7950X has more cache than, say, a 7900X is that it has more cores. Adobe, Web Browsing, Office, and Productivity on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Image 1 of 6 Based on 3,996 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,463 CPUs. Mar 31, 2023 · Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Ryzen 9 7950X Ray Tracing Benchmarks. The problem is that only half of its cores have 3D V-Cache, meaning Windows can mess up the core prioritization. The two chips are equally fast in Crysis Remastered, while Cyberpunk 2077 sees the 7950X3D take an 11% lead over the 7950X at 720p. On average of 16 reviews, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D gain +3. Anyone serious about productivity software that can use multi-core effectively and doesn't care about gaming should get a 7950X and anyone serious about gaming and doesn't specifically need multi-core productivity should get 7800X3D. ). X3d chips also perform the best in gaming. 7950x vs 7950x3D at 4k This is the largest and most active CS sub on Reddit. X3d is mostly beneficial in games, so if you don't care about that, and you don't care about the power efficiency, then 7950x is technically faster. Third, longevity. Or check it out in the app stores 13900K vs 7950x3D vs 7950x . If you need the productivity along w/ gaming, I still feel 7950x is the better value. Over time the cost of running a 7950x will be lower, saving money. x3d is great for most games, but not all, and less so for productivity. Given the X3D version doesn't exist to us yet, the extent of performance difference is not known to us, but it will likely be better in basically every workload. It also draws half the power (140W vs 282W) that the 14900K does - which means less heat, and therefore less noise. But truthfully, hypothetically, what is the difference in 100 frames you may get with a 7950X3D, or the 98 you’d get with the 7700X? This way they have sold tons of 7900x, 7950x to gamers and will sell tons of 7900x3D and 7950x3D to gamers too. I could get new 7950X from local website for about $470 (Im from eastern EU), and Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $300 more expensive than 7950X I Also, if simulation kind of workloads are your thing, where the load demands higher volumes of cache, going with a 7950x3d may actually be the better choice. Aside from having some strange issues until I flashed the newest BIOS, everything has just worked. I believe this is largely due to the 7950X3D being a 120W TDP chip in order to not overheat the V-cache on top of one of the CCD's, vs the normal 7950X running stock at 170W TDP. Somehow 7800x3D generally performs better at games. Updated Grand Slam Standings 2. Generally speaking, the 7950x is a bit faster (3-4%), with slightly higher frequency and much higher power draw (250W vs 155W in Blender). If you think you could use the extra cores by all means get the 7950x3d. At Stock 7950x3d>13900k>7950x for gaming 13900k>7950x>7950x3d for productivity Both the 13900k at 7950x can be cooled by a phantom spirit(253w power limit with a slightly undervolt) (at stock a 280/360mm aio would be nice which cost around 50-60 bucks minimum vs 35 for the phantom spirit) The reason is due to the core architecture design. Put it this way, the extra cores and speed of 7950x far outweigh the small gaming gains of 7900x3d (and 7950x costs less). If you're not doing anything CPU-heavy, then you shouldn't even consider things like 7900X or 7950X. 8% over the Core i9-13900K at gaming performance, and +2. 7800x3d is designed specifically for gaming though. The cache on chip (which is SRAM) is comparatively blazing fast and quick to respond in only a few nanoseconds. the ryzen 9 7900x has 12 cores vs the ryzen 7950x having 16. and maybe sometimes game on it (gaming is the least important thing for me). The 7950X3D is better for gaming. when you play on lower resolutions it might make a difference. there are good enough aio's, but you'd spend less getting just a decent waterblock and some soft tubing to still beat the best of best aio's The 3D V-Cache is the difference, which can greatly benefit workloads like gaming. In parallel, I'll have to build a separate workstation/server with a more mainstream part like a 7950x or 13900 for other duties. Some applications do love the cache, but if a 13900k was faster than a 7950x most of the time the 7950x3d will still lose. Pros of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X(3D): Way more efficient than the 14900K. 1. I went with 7950x and performance gains are worse. AMD’s chips on the other hand can be taken care of by a Noctua Air cooler and run absolute balls to the wall stock with PBO, leaving you extra room t Build Help. When cache is hit, the 7950x3d usually flies away. I turned on EXPO (CL30 6000MHz) and my PC boots in like 10 seconds. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The Intel chips will easily blow through 320W and thermal throttle even on 360 AIOs. Fact is: The AMD Ryzen 9 7950x has 16 full grown cores whilst the latest intel i9 13900k is only coming with 8 performance cores and 16 efficiency cores. I don’t even have power draw set to 133%. In terms of CPU clock cycles, going out to system memory (your DRAM) is slow as balls taking milliseconds to get data back. This means that AMD has stacked the cache on top of the I tend to think that the x900 (7900X, 7900X3D, ) CPUs are a bad compromise. It's pretty much all about the fact that 7800x3D is a perfect sweetspot and thus had to be delayed to fleece customers who can't wait any longer. I do know that the performance gains with the 7950x in terms of gaming are 5 - 10 fps at best. Discussion So before reviews and 7950x vs 7950x3d I see what you mean (Benchmark and CPU details) The base clock is faster on the non-3d, but they are both at the same turbo clock of 5. There is hardly any oc potential either. If you absolutely need every last drop of cpu performance and the x3d doesn’t help go with the 7950x. I am a bit confused as to which one should I get considering my use case and longevity. However, this does require some tinkering and the 7800x3d is comparable or even beats the 7950x3d fully stock which is why people say that. If both platforms cost roughly the same and trade blows in terms of performance, the 7950x wins. Will the 7950X3D show significant improvements over the 7950x in 1440P gaming with the extra cache? or will the improvements be shown mostly in 1080P? Archived post. I do know that some users struggled with the usage of hyperV whilst the efficiency cores were enabled (presuming that the efficiency cores aren’t any good use for virtualisation). So for current Ryzen generation, get a 7800x3d or 7950x3d. This requires you to disable the second CCD (which doesn't have 3D V-Cache) for the most gaming performance. Unless you're trying to hit top 1-5% frame rate, there's hardly a difference when taking into account other hardware limitations. I will also play games on my PC but production and software development is the main load. No the 7900x3d is a pointless cpu for example 7950x3d is better in both gaming and productivity, the 7800x3d is better in gaming and really close to the 7900x3d in productivity. For games in the middle the 7950x3d wins about half compared to the 13900k Productivity: for the most part a power limited 7950x. Right now I am leaning on returning the 7950x3D, but FOMO is kicking in Eh, FOMO got you 2 CPUs to begin with. Look at performance of 7950x3d with the freq cc'd disabled for how 7800x3d performs. i cant decide between 7950X3D vs 13900K(s) which one choose , i am 4k gamer and use a lot in day of mine pc but i cant decide because : 7950X3D Pros : + support 2025+ + lower power draw gaming than 13900k(s) Cons: - good only at ubisoft games but others game not perform well - high idle power around 66-75w ! (this is crazy) ,which 13900K(s I mainly use premier pro and edit with 4k footage with multiple effects as well. OS will be Linux (with the newest kernel) (if that's relevant for drivers or the scheduler). on older cpu bound games like cs:go it would make a difference but there 13900k is king. It's a huge performance jump in gaming over the 7950X, and only a small decrease in most workloads. I've seen several sources claiming that the AMD 7950X(3D) is not that stable. 7800X3D will be faster. Currently I have ordered both the 7900x and the 7950x, and will be cancelling one of the orders. The deltas are notably smaller in ray-traced titles, as the GPU does much of the heavy lifting. The whole non-cache CCD, parking/unparking core mess with Windows Game bar may impacts games where games weren’t ran on the “correct” cores. Hello, Ill mainly use PC with those 2 CPUs for homelabs, running 3-4-5 VMs in the same time, program in the same time etc. (starting with the 7960x) I built a 7950x system mainly to do fluid and smoke calculations but I didn't see the improvements I was hoping for, my scenes are buggy detailed, some frames can exceed 1gb in size ranging from 300 frames to 1000. X3D cache from 7950X3D to 7800X3D will be the same. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon… 7950x would be the better option over x3d for most productivity applications. Using freq ccd for encoding and x3d ccd for game will result is a net loss in performance vs 7950x. In the best case, you only gain a few % over, say, the 7700X, in the worst case it'll be even worse because of inter-die latency. In Dying Light 2, the Ryzen 9 79509X3D is 20% faster than the the 7950X3D 3d cache cores runs at 4. It's 60% work and 40% games/other ratio and I don't need the maximum performance the industry has to offer for my work. The difference between the 7950X and 7950X3D is more or less the exact same for 4K and very very few VR games benefit from 3D cache. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Online tests show that the 7950X3D is a very power efficient chip, able to perform almost the same as a 7950x but with 30% lower power consumption. Both 7950x and 7950X3D sit on top of Intel’s 13900k and 14900k chips in passmark. Just be aware if you are running a cpu intensive application when gaming the 2nd ccd will "wake up" and your game and other applications will bounce around so much the extra benefit of the 3d v-cache will be basically nothing--your fps will be basically the same as a 7950x. The 7900x3d is pointless. I don't use buffer sizes larger than 128 as there's a noticeable input delay, so the X3D was the right choice fo rme. 7Ghz, so the 3d cache should be the only diff at load, hence the high score for same cores and speeds at turbo (load) but for some reason the non-3d still beats out per core over the 3d. 7900x3d kinda doesn’t have a place in this is my point. Im planning buying new PC so I plan to not upgrade anything in following 3-4-5 years. 0Ghz on the 7800X3D. if you are happy Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. Both CPUs are perfectly stable with current BIOS updates and I never heard of anything like "amdip" as an AMD user. 7ghz) vs 5. 9Ghz gaming(not 5. the Intel 13900K/KS with 7200+MHz DDR5 may be the fastest at some games that prefer frequency over cache, and slightly faster than the 7950X3D at productivity and about the same The 7950x3d is better than the 7800x3d it is basically a 7800x3d combined with 8 cores of a slightly lower clocked 7950x. See full list on techspot. FOMO tickles my brain because I bought the 7900X3D, because scalpers decimated the 7950X3D stock, and then the 7800X3D turns out to be better for gaming (which is all I do anyway) and cheaper too. if you buying intel's best, get a custom loop. a. Cache = good. Everyday work is related to software development (lots of compiling, etc. upvotes 7950X3D is king in low latency DAW benchmarks. Even if the platform costs of the 7950x are slightly higher, this could get evened out over time. Members Online. Edit: 'Idle Watts' and 'Cinebench Watts' are measured from the wall using a meter, and included the entire PC setup including two AW3418DW ultrawide monitors, usbhub, speakers, rtx3090, etc. 7950x3d is a no brainer if you get such a price! more cores means you can do things in the background also higher clocks which helps with future proofing even if thats not a thing you will get an extra boost in the future vs the 7800x3d I'm curious if anyone has any benchmarks of using a 7950x vs any of the new threadrippers in chaos phoenix. Similarly that applies to the 7950X3D - as it has 8 non-X3D cores which get cache, but not the super big chunk of X3D cache. I generally recommend people get the 7800X3D, but if you know what you're getting into, the 7950X3D is a good middle ground for people who do heavy workloads and gaming. This got me thinking: 7800x3d vs 7950x3d vs 7950x I'm building a new workstation and cannot decide which CPU to go with. yep, lots of cores on 1 chip generates allot of heat. Or you could just get a 7800X3D, which is literally just a 7950X3D without the second CCD. The 7950X3D has two CCD's (core complex dies) which contain said cores, obviously. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The software part is a bit janky and unreliable. On am5 lineup you either get 7950x or 7800x3D imo. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now so the obvious choice would be a 7950X3d (or 7950X if they don't like the scheduling issues) or To my experience with amd 5800x3d the cache didn't increase the number of effects or tracks or reduce latency. theres a reason theres guides to shutting cores off for some chips to improve thermals/gaming performance. If you need more productivity out of your CPU (which it doesn't seem like you do), a better and cheaper option is 7950x which still does really well in games with it's higher clocks compared to 7900x3d. Feb 28, 2023 · Here the 7950X3D produced the best result yet with an average frame rate of 84 fps, with a 14% uplift over the standard 7950X, though this made it just 5% faster than the 13900KS using DDR5-7200 More stable than the AMD counterpart. I can only name 2 out the 160+ that I have. It is not worth it to most people. I've been considering upgrading my PC from a 3700X, and I want something that is excellent at productivity tasks (working with large datasets…. neither cpu will bottleneck ur graphics card. Then I come on reddit and read all these posts about memory issues and long boot times, etc. If you're going to want something which is efficient there is no way around the 7950x running in eco mode or 7950x3d at stock while the x3d chip is even faster than the regular version. Insanely variant and user dependent. Gpu suts at 48 degrees while gaming, and under stress tests it can max at 60 degrees under full load. Well without any OC it’s highest clock is 5500 and Cinebench is 36000 7950x can max out at 93 degrees in Cinebench, but in gaming it’s usually 70-80. I got more bang with a pair of gen4 nvme with enough space for the sampler libraries (Kontact) and recently I upgraded to a 5950 and now I can run more simulator instances like Bitwig Grid and AAS Chromaphone. The cross CCD cache hits and added heat of 7950x3d in this scenario drag it down. So it's essentially the 5800X3D vs the 7700X vs something like the 13700K. 011v) and limited the settings to the same as the 5950x, just to see how it would compare. Beside that it is better but also cost more. the 7950X should be faster at productivity than the 7950X3D due to higher frequency on both CCXs, and equal with the 7950X3D at games that prefer frequency over cache. If you are building a PC around 7950X, you're likely not gaming at 1080P nor are you going with 6600XT or something. I have to decide between the Ryzen 9 7950x3d vs 7950x. smaxz zgazxf exbzl hub lrqacv yqnw wygqtmr vriyi jws jpswsjhf